KARL JASPERS FORUM

TA 63 (Leslie / Rees)

Commentary 40 (to C36, Muller)

( AHA )
by Peter Mutnick
12 March 2004, posted 3 April 2004

[Herbert Muller]

I agree with your formulation in <11>. But I would say that one should see natural order as subject-inclusive rather than subjective <12>, which sounds solipsistic. This distinction is clear if one understands the subject-object split as secondary (pragmatic).

Your vocabulary is reminiscent of Whitehead's, could you comment on that ?

[Peter Mutnick]

Finally, you have revealed your true colors. Now I understand why you as a conventional psychiatrist seem to be, but only seem to be, espousing radical views. Of course your views are not radical and revert easily to the gross materialism which is the dross of our race. For after all, when pressed to identify what it is that exists, your answer is, if not materialism, materially-weighted (or objectively-weighted) experience.

----------------------------------------

Peter Mutnick