KARL JASPERS FORUM
Short Note 26B
(On N26A, on Ellis and Newton`s Three
Paradoxes, by HFJ Muller)


SOME COMMENTS ABOUT ELLIS AND NEWTON CONTROVERSY.
by Arturo Aguilar
8 January 1999, posted 12 January 1999



I believe that Ellis does not understand that MDR (Maya?) is all we (humans) have and he seems to think that the MIR concept refers to such reality; as you point out:

'The traditional view is to regard the universe as mind-independent, that is as metaphysically (absolutely) real.'

Although your idea about the matrix and Henkel's perfectly symmetric sphere try to conceptualize or visualize MIR, I think that MIR is ineffable for human observers. However, for all practical purposes it is as if MIR did not exist. I even wonder if any further attempts to understand MIR are fruitful or useful. I would like to know if that is what you meant when you said: '(nor is MIR possible)' in: 'I agree with this statement but do not think that it has to do with MIR; it does not require MIR _(nor is MIR possible)_.

Arturo Aguilar
e-mail <samayoa@servidor.unam.mx>
Dr. Arturo Aguilar
F.T. Professor, Faculty of Psychology, UNAM
APDO. POSTAL COP-084
04331 Mexico, D.F. MEXICO