KARL JASPERS FORUM

TA63 (Leslie / Rees)

Commentary 10 (to C8, Nixon)

I'D RATHER BE A HAMMER THAN A NAIL; AMEN
by Adrian van der Meijden
8 November 2003, posted 16 November 2003

<1>
Dear Greg,

offhand I can pick off a dozen or more fundamentals in your own perora. I tried doing that for a while but it hardly ever goes anywhere beyond a stony silence. The fundamental has to be a thing, it cannot be a function. The fundamental is actually our ignorance, but we don't like that. One of the worst I find to be pop psycho projections of behaviours, or for academe, verbal tricks and jargon with gratuitous stereotypes attached; all outdated Pavlov. To be different is to be deaded or made out as mad. It does not start to happen until the Victorian era and in Alice Red and White don't communicate. *WE* all know why and how. The map is not the territory, is not the terrain and is not one's understanding or experience of it.

<2>
It is not the individual who is responsible for doing it but our society installing our ego it henceforth manipulates like crazy. For science the word is field, context or the totems and taboos of the 9 to 5 workday. To our governments we're only teamhorses that better behave, or else you're punished. Isolation is supposed to bring us to heel and being ignored is rather common. We're not paranoid as Lacan has it, we're scared and scarred with long time deprivation. It's our society, our culture. Being taught "facts" that are fictions without foundation at an age of non-discretion and held responsible once an adult. I like to think that it works the same way as science portrays mass: aggregates homogenise. We call ourselves individuals, but are we? Here the topic is supposed to be Qconsciousness but I've yet to see a post seriously tackling that and so we go for old hat POV chess games inside academe as pecking order games. It is not science but our society which is against q consciousness.

<3>
As per usual the problem or issue is already solved, at a grassroots level, by the so-called unlettered mavericks and blithely ignored until the numbers grow large enough to reach beyond benign neglect. Whence again as per usual, we begin to pretend it was like that all along. nuf sed.

<4> We dream which we are told is hallucinating. Yet if we don't dream we go crazy or irrational. So how come I do my *thinking* in my dreams ? During the day we deal with parts, bits, words, details. So naturally at night it turns about into holistics and intuition using our sensorium in taboo ways. I find that ESP or PSI and q behaviours make a matching set offending against communal, 3rd person sense and our worldmap of form, space and time. Anybody can work out that the permute of 3 is 6 -> 720 -> too much for a 10 digit calculator. Our conscious mind, sense bound halts at 7 + or - 2, but the unconscious, real, mind which keeps us in illusions has no such limit. It's the red king who needs a notebook, Alice needs no such thing. So only those who are intuitive can be creative, a non-taboo word for being irrational. Ahh, Internet, full of wolly wafflers, but a goldmine for gold diggers. We did quite well out of electricity not even knowing what it was for over a Century. So what gives with the insistence on the well defined word ? It's a parroting game.

<5>
You cannot see a telescope you're looking through, although one can tell indirectly by inference, and so too with consciousness, it's THE bottom line argument. If one takes all the heavily defended kosher words and twitches their definitions, an easy game, It does not take too long to figure out why it is taboo to do so. Play it on yourself. It works better than dowsing. For every pejorative reaction alarum bells tingle up and down the spine and into the body unto a body armour of great blindness. When and how does it start ? From baby upwards by well intentioned parenting. My family, and so some others too, Mendel distibution spawn high conventionals and high mavericks alike. Potluck ? Well, whatever, one gets blamed or praised. It's a dominant gene, passed along both male and female lines. So, I give some credit to Bucke of Cosmic Consciousness.

<6>
The new information tells us:

- Consciousness can modify our DNA, which clarifies evolution.

- Memory is not confined to the brain, which ruins educational tactics.

- Matter is frozen musical energy.

- Unless suppressed we're all psychic, which clarifies the problem of

meaning. The crop of star seeds or indigos since about 1992 is shocking

evidence.

- We're at the bottom line with terrorism, which is a subjective sensation

misprised hunting ghosts.

- If we add consciousness to our already imaginary particles the entire QC charade is solved. It is not actually particles but that's only incidental since particles are proven telepathic.

<7>
What it amounts to is that to demolish intellect is a terrifying task, or so it seems to some. Others simply cannot help but do it. I dislike 0-D because it is a euphemism, perhaps of some use a Century ago, but no longer. It's NO D but it cannot start at 0 which is a sneaky form of materialism. Plato would not asccept that nothing from nothing comes while St Augustine who already invested his universe with a mind had no problem with it. How does it get from no-form or materialistic non-existence into form ? Simple: Ascension2000.com starts with CU - consciousness units at just beyond infinity as an ultra-weak energy- which self assemble into Bose Einstein condensates that make up non-repetitive cycles of a harmonic kind. Dare I mention it, because once I do, it puts folk off, It was done by a channel and yes, I agree, most of them are pure nonsense but one should never throw out the baby with the bathwater. It's Whitehead vindicated: truth will out despite all opposition. The sequence is that CU work by attraction [ Rg Veda: In the beginning was desire], which preconditions E.M. plasma states that work up into autopoeic stability we call matter, but which are standing wave patterns.

<8>
What went wrong is that in order to pick up on anomalies, asymmetries or difference we need a made up fixed and stably uniform background, which is a fiction and a map. And the map became reality. Fractals and holograms demonstrate that we need no such thing as a map with a zero centre reference. It uses musical hopscotch of frequency octaves, meaning "same" at any size. They are all very old concepts, long ago abandoned because the simplification it generated was mistaken for the real thing. In short, until consciousness gets its act together, there's nothing we can observe. The Buddha had it right and the black joke is that that is called a hallucination by authority.

-----------------------------------------------

Adrian vdMeijden