KARL JASPERS FORUM
TA32 (Muller)
Commentary 33
GENERAL COMMENTS ON METAPHYSICS OF SPACE AND MOTION
by Geoff Haselhurst
8 May 2001, posted 15 May 2001
<1>
I have spent several hours readng your web site. I am quite amazed! (I have thought a lot about the mind and how we can know things about the world around us!)
<2>
I send you a few thoughts to provoke/ stimulate your mind, but I really need six months to complete this work, which includes logical deductions of the laws of physics and unification of QT and Relativity, the solutions to the problems of Cosmology, and solving the problems of metaphysics and thus philosophy - currently I have about a thousand pages of text that I am editing and writing up!
<3>
It makes me smile (in a frustrated kind of way at the moment) for although I know little of the subject of psychiatry and chemistry of the brain, I understand reality and how matter exists in space and is interconnected with other matter in Space within our universe. Thus I know what humans are and how we are necessarily connected to matter in this Space around us. (How we can sense objects and know they exist). Thus when I read your work (and others) I can clearly see their problems and how they try to overcome them. But if you don't know what exists, and its necessary connections it is impossible to have certain (necessary) knowledge and thus science/philosophy fails. Thus they all try, they get parts right, but they ultimately never connect it all in ONE completely consistent logical sensible whole.
<4>
The beautiful thing about philosophy is that it shows us how to determine the truth. Currently philosophy is telling us that we cannot with certainty know the truth, and this is simply because post-modern philosophy does not know the truth. Once truth IS known then the converse applies and it becomes possible for philosophy to prove that this is the truth. It seems to me, from reading your work (and because I generally only read the great philosophers) that you possess both a logical skeptical critical mind, and historical knowledge of the subjects of physics and philosophy. This is rare! On the other hand you seem to believe that there can be no absolute metaphysics which describes reality (truly, not as how it is represented to us) and by describing reality thus define the meaning of the words used and how they are necessarily connected to physical reality.
<5>
I can describe this metaphysics of reality to you such that it is logically consistent with our senses. (It necessarily/logically connects our language to the real world).
The Metaphysics of Space and Motion is founded on :
1. One Absolute, Eternal, Infinite Fundamental Existent Space
2. The secondary/ further existence of the (wave) Motion of Space
From these two existents we must add
3. The existence of Form/Shape i.e. Spherical/Ellipsoidal Standing Waves in Space.
4. The existence of change in velocity of wave Motion. What we call Acceleration, i.e. The velocity of Waves in Space is dependent on; (This still requires mathematical verification)
i) The Wave Amplitude and phase relationship (This explains Charge and light (anti-matter is opposite phase SSW)
ii) The Wave Density - higher Wave-Density slower Wave Velocity (This explains gravity)
<6>
Now I can describe a common experiment (experience that we can both agree with) that confirms the existence of these four things (out of the many things that exist). Let me hold a ball in my hand and then drop it.
I sense;
Space - The ball exists in this Space around me
Motion - The ball Moves through Space (falls to the earth)
Spherical Form/Shape - The spherical shape of the ball
Acceleration - The ball falls with an increasing velocity.
Thus my senses (and yours, please confirm this!?) clearly confirm that these four things exist in the universe, or at least in our common sense (that we both sense this) in the universe.
<7>
What is remarkable is that from this Metaphysics of Space and Motion (the Spherical Standing Wave (SSW) Structure of Matter in Space) I think we can explain ALL other things that exist (given time!) e.g. processes, subjects and objects, a priori and a posteriori knowledge, species, identity, consciousness, etc. etc.)
<8>
Certainly I can now explain and solve most of the major problems of both physics and philosophy (which is exactly what one must necessarily be able to do if they know reality!) (I cannot explain mind/ representation, but I can explain mind/ knowledge)
<9>
All problems of human knowledge can be simplified to two things
1. State What Exists (Either material/relational/process)
2. Show how the existents MUST be necessarily connected.
<10>
Let me make a few further comments on this;
The Metaphysics of Space and Motion is founded on the fact that we ALL sense that we exist in Space, and conversely, without Space nothing can exist. (All things require Space to exist in)
For 2,500 years the problem has been "What is the second thing that can exist within the One thing Space". (Explain the problem of the One and the Many) (The mistakes have been to assume both particles and time as also existing)
<11>
The answer is obvious once known. The second most fundamental thing that exists is the (Wave) motion of Space. Space is rigid (like the ether of e-m theory) and vibrates. (Space is most like a solid - rather than a liquid or a gas, which are merely properties of loosely connected Wave Centers in a nearly rigid Space). Thus we see how the second existent Motion exists within the First Existent Space.
<12>
Once we have this foundation it becomes easier, for it is obvious from reading Physics that matter exists with the following properties : like a particle like a wave experiences time exists everywhere in the universe (action at a distance). Is spherically spatially extended (Einstein agreed with Mach and thought matter to be interconnected with all other matter in the finite spherical universe).
<13>
A Spherical Standing Wave the size of the universe (in fact defines the finite spherical universe within an infinite space) solves all of these existents.
<14>
Particle Wave duality of matter - The focal point/wave-center of the Spherical In and Out waves obviously explains the discrete particle behaviour of matter.
Time is not a fundamental existent and this has hugely confused humanity!!!! Time is caused by the finite velocity of waves in Space, thus it takes Time for a wave to flow from place to place in Space.
<15>
Action at a distance - becomes obvious and is due to a change in velocity of the In-Waves as they flow in through other Spherical Standing Waves and how this necessarily changes where they meet at the Wave Center (the cause of the accelerated motion of the particle) Gravity. - Thus the reason why the ball falls to the earth is simply because the In-waves of the ball travel more slowly through the higher Wave-Density Space (Existent 4 above) that we call the matter of Earth. This causes the position of the Wave-Centers (ball) to change and accelerate towards the earth - which we see as the ball falling. Light-Resonant coupling occurs between two bound electrons/ Wave-centers in atoms or molecules such that they have some oscillating 'orbital' frequency (not an orbit like planets but more like a complex wave-function or repeating pattern.)
<16>
These two resonators can couple like two tuning forks and exchange vibrational energy. This is always in discrete amounts as is consistent with standing wave interactions and thus explains the quantum energy transfers of light (photons) - there are no separate light particles or collapsing wave functions, both being mathematical existents only!
<17>
If we consider infinite Space then we must also ask where do the spherical out waves go, and where do the In waves come from? (Cosmology). Milo Wolff (see TA32 C31) and I are just finally writing up the Cosmology - we can solve ALL problems by showing how Finite Spherical Standing Waves form within an infinite perpetual Space.
<18>
There is a Huygens sharing of waves such that distant matter's Out waves (spherically distributed about me in Space) form my Spherical In-Waves. There is no Big Bang because the red-shift with distance is not velocity/ Doppler caused, rather it is due to a lower energy interaction with distant wave-centers (particles) which is in turn caused by the fact that distant matter shares less of our common spherical universe.
<19>
Once the two spheres, representing the universes of each Wave-Center (particle) no longer overlap (imagine spherical Venn diagrams) then we cannot see the other particle, and it's Out waves no longer directly contribute to our In-Waves. This explains the following; (I send headings only for I am writing this up at the moment)
<20>
3.1 Space is Infinite and Ageless (Eternal)
3.2 On How Our Finite Spherical Universe Exists Within an Infinite Space (Huygens' Principle)
3.3 The Equation of the Cosmos (Deducing the Finite Size of Our Spherical Standing Waves and Thus our Universe)
3.4 On Why our Finite Spherical Universe does not Become 'Impoverished'
3.5 On the Second Law of Thermodynamics and Why Our Perpetual Universe is Ordered
3.6 On How our Universe is Necessarily Connected but not Deterministic (Godel's Incompleteness Theorem.)
3.7 On How Our Lack of Knowledge of Our Necessary Connections to the Universe Causes Chance
3.8 On How We can Have 'Limited Free Will' in a Necessarily Connected Universe
3.9 Explaining Olber's Paradox and Why the Stars of the Night Sky do not Appear Infinitely Bright
3.10 Explaining Newton, Mach and Einstein's Infinite Mass Paradox and Mach's Principle
3.11 On Einstein's 'Curvature of the Four Dimension Space-Time Continuum' (Why Our Universe is 3D and 'Flat').
3.12 Explaining Einstein's Famous Cosmological (Antigravity) Constant. (And Further Predictions)
3.13 The End of the 'Big Bang' - The Explanation of the 'Quantised' Hubble Redshift with Distance
<21>
In ending this rambling piece of Metaphysics!
What I wish to say to you is that from reading your work and some of the ideas you discuss on your web site, that I think I will be able to solve virtually ALL your disputes. Now this would be extraordinary, and I know that you will naturally/skeptically be wary of such a claim - but then I am a unique philosopher, for I am the first philosopher to know the truth of what exists. - Thus while I make no claims to any great genius and accept that all my knowledge initially came from others greater than myself (Aristotle, Hume, Einstein, to name a few!) I have the advantage of their combined knowledge and now an awareness of where they are right and wrong.
<22>
The power that this gives to human thought is quite simply staggering! As you appear to be a quality critical thinker, it seems to me (as a skeptical philosopher) that if I know the truth then I should be able to provide you with the same knowledge such that you will (given time and thought) come to the same conclusion that I have. Further, that you will find this truth amazing in how it guides you and solves your problems. So while I know you will be skeptical I wished to make you aware of my thoughts, and thus my predictions about your future discoveries. (Thus in effect you are an experiment for me, to confirm my logic both about reality, and about our ability as thinking humans to know and agree on this reality)
There is no need to reply to this email, I will send you better work in time that is far more complete and systematic.
Hope you enjoyed it as I enjoyed reading your work.
Will talk to you in Montreal in another month, and will send some comments on your essays (I downloaded three) plus my emerging written work between now and then.
<23>
PS - As I am writing a book to convince sensible skeptical people that reality has been discovered, it intensely interests me as to how my style of writing and ideas 'infect' other people's minds, to see how smart minds react and respond - such that I may learn.
I live as an isolated philosopher (with my girlfriend) in the forests (near the beach where I caught a lovely big Australian Salmon two days ago!) of South Western Australia, and thus I do not meet local people who are able to discuss such subjects leaving me quite isolated from intellectuals – though I am starting to correspond more on the internet, it is very time consuming and interferes with my writing of the book
---------------------------------
Geoff Haselhurst